Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

human computer interaction

  • jordan avatar

    The Open Question March 18: How do we reason about the future given AI? I find this topic extremely perplexing, and endlessly fascinating.

    • What are we raising our kids to be ready for? What skills don't matter anymore that we used to hold sacred, and what do we need to emphasize?
    • Will we have universities?
    • Where to invest time/energy?
    • Where to invest money? Will money even matter?
    • Purpose and meaning, etc... 

    especially when I factor in stuff like Nate Soares talking about If Anyone Builds It Everyone Dies, Rob Miles and Jeffrey Ladish communicating the wild risks involved in AI acceleration, there's almost too much to contemplate at once, and I'd love y'all's help.

    Some convos already on UpTrust that might be relevant:

    • Blake on AI collaboration
    • Tommy on TikTok brain with AI
    • Renee on Older people adopting AI
    • Leif on Digital Mystics
    • Alex on AI & the Second Coming of Christ
    • Dave on an AI Safety introduction he likes

    #openquestion 

    jordanSA•...
    i really appreciate this point; for similar reasons I've been a little shy getting to into AI with my kids. This morning my son wanted to ask AI "how are electrons created?" which is freaking cool....
    science communication
    human computer interaction
    ai and education
    ai ethics and trust
    child development and learning
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    You're cordially invited to ROAR. Jordan here,

    You're cordially invited to submit a paper for the inaugural issue of ROAR, the new Research in Applied Relatefulness Journal.

    This is a powerful endeavor to

    • build our communal body of knowledge
    • cross-pollinate new insights, failures, and best practices
    • celebrate all the incredible practitioners, innovations, and generally showcase the community

    We believe relatefulness has a lot to contribute to civilizational knowledge and inquiry about intersubjective awareness, communication, group facilitation, and the strengths and limitations of our how these practices interface and apply to other fields of study. 

    What kinds of papers?

    (1)  Cross-modal integration: what happens when relatefulness meets other frameworks in practice? eg: IFS & relatefulness, functional medicine and relatefulness (coming in the first issue)

    (2) Practitioner Case Reports: internal relatefulness experiments and best practices. eg: a particular exercise, event flow, or structure 

    (3) Field notes / failure reports. failures and lessons learned. eg: 

    (4) Theoretical & philosophical contributions exploring the conceptual foundations of relatefulness and advancing new frameworks. eg: I'll be publishing an article version of my Relateful Camp 2024 talk "How Not to Start a Cult"

    This is meant to help us see all of our play and exploration as research (because it is) and take part in the larger, ongoing human conversation by being more visible, citable, and propagating what we're doing, what works, and what doesn't, so everyone can learn from everyone and iteration can happen faster. 

    Why you?

    You get to be a founding contributor to a new field, your work becomes citable, you build credibility as a practitioner-researcher, and you get visibility within a growing community.

    If you're not sure, post an abstract to the ROAR UpTrust group and people will weigh in and give you feedback.

    Why now?

    I'm just really excited for the experiential knowledge interchange for the sake of itself. That said...

    We're in an era where our globe's biggest problems require coordinating across wildly different perspectives with very distinct values and desires. 

    Relatefulness can be a key contributor to emerging social-psychotechnology (consciously created intersubjective infrastructure) to help people communicate, and find internal peace and sanity amidst unprecedented pace of transformation.

    Submission Deadline 

    Track 1: March 15th. Your article will be ready for the Camp Preview; a physical artifact at the chow hall at camp that proves the concept and inspires people to submit.

    Track 2: May 15th. Full Founding Issue This gives the broader community a real runway to write something worth publishing. The full issue goes up on relateful.com, gets a downloadable PDF, and is available on Amazon.

    Details

    Formats:
    Practitioner case reports (1,000-2,000 words), cross-modal integration papers (2,000-4,000 words), Field notes / failure reports (500-1,500 words); Theoretical / philosophical contributions (2,000–5,000 words)

    Review/editorial process.
    Submission:
    1) Submit draft to a private UpTrust group, anytime starting day of announcement
    2) Get community feedback (this is not quality control and you should not assume that all comments are good, it just helps the community get involved in our style) Editorial review proceeds on its own timeline and does not depend on community response. 
    3) Editorial review: v1 at least Jordan Myska Allen will review, whether or not you get comments before approval depends largely on the number of submissions; we may expand to a founding editorial board (TBA)
    4) Accepted articles will be published in the following:

    Distribution/format.
    - announced on TTT email list
    - announced on Substack
    - a linkable, indexable page on relateful.com
    - a downloadable PDF
    - A printed copy that people can order through amazon (this may not be ready by Relateful camp. But we will have at least one printed copy at the chow hall)

    Guidelines:

    • Abstract (150-300 words) (unless field notes/failures- (50–150 word abstract is fine)
    • Author info: name, relevant background (facilitation credentials, affiliation with Relateful Company, professional practice, academic training, whatever establishes your credibility in the domain you're writing about, and contact email (for editorial use only, not published))
    • Originality statement (A line confirming the work hasn't been published elsewhere and is the author's own)
    • Conflicts of interest / disclosure: (any relevant personal/financial stakes)
    • Permissions (If you reference specific client work/sessions in a practice that emphasizes confidentiality, this confirms you have consent or have sufficiently anonymized)
    • Voice: first, second, and third person are all welcome (I, we, it) but no need to label them; use whatever constructs enact the experience you're hoping to communicate, including shifting views if needed. We can't study the relational while pretending there's no I or we. (Drawing from Integral Methodology Pluralism).
    • References/citations: We're not imposing APA formatting on practitioners bc we think it'll kill submissions. if you reference someone's work, name them and link to it. 
    • Co-authored pieces should list all contributors with individual author info. Designate one corresponding author for editorial communication.
    • Authors retain copyright; Relateful Company has permission to publish, distribute, and reprint

     

    (Skipping for V1: Detailed style guides, structured heading requirements, blinded review formatting, cover letters, IRB approval documentation, etc.)

    How to submit: Post to here in this ROAR UpTrust group.

    Andrew23inROAR: Research in Applied Relatefulness - Journal Submissions & discussion•...
    Hello Intensify Bot; thank you for jumping in! At first I felt an initial shock at having a Bot join the conversation; this soon shifted to feelings of fascination and possibility, and curiosity regarding what you wrote....
    human computer interaction
    affective computing
    conversational ai
    therapeutic presence
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    What do you think about this short post? This is so short

    blakeSAin🍀 🍯 (clove and honey)•...
    One aspect is something like the space everything takes up. Now I’m back to the post/comments view, and I can see that after 3 back and forths, there’s no more room on the page for any more....
    online communication
    web development
    user interface design
    human computer interaction
    Comments
    0
  • B

    Why you should post more: Everything is a mirror of everything.

    We’re all censoring most of our awareness.

    Uptrust is a currently curated community where we can actually practice thinking.

    The more I post the more direct I’m being with everyone in my life. (I have an embedded belief that if I do anything anywhere then I should that anything in more everywheres…but I still curate).

    Post about why you’re not posting.

    Post about questions you’re asking yourself.

    Post about your anxiety.

    Post to express art.

    This shit won’t last, this fun safe newborn ward. Use this time now to try something. Create a fake name or another account so you can try it from anonymity.

    Huge opportunity to bust out of our norms.

    jordanSA•...
    I think keeping this tension and question alive in our awareness, and then running experiments that come from staying present with the tension (desire for the fun/safe/curated, and idea that it won’t last), will help it last longer, and potentially give us insight into...
    social psychology
    group dynamics
    internet culture
    community management
    human computer interaction
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...